| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Carniflex wrote: I have not been keeping an eye who tries to take credit for what, however, the change of policy in regards of ISBoxer was probably a reasonable decision and possibly backed up by the data at CCP disposal (say, based on number o...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.11 08:06:37
|
62. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mike Azariah wrote: I did look at the Skynet thread, still do. I have said there that I am against afk play of any sort and so I am not grr fighters I am grr you do all the work with my tools. So are you also against the proposed change to a...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.11 06:58:07
|
63. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mike Azariah wrote: No, Game mechanics vs stagnation Aaaaand he dodges my entire callout. GJ.
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.11 05:50:53
|
64. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rroff wrote: That revenant was 20-30km outside the FF IIRC, logged in on that spot (possibly the same spot he'd cyno'd in at) into a trap due to getting sloppy (not to discredit the efforts PL put in). Your taking a lot of what I'm saying to ov...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.11 03:56:29
|
65. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rroff wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: If they are forced to turn on their control tower and thus lose connection / power to their drones, I'd say that's Op success? I dunno about you, but according to my PYFA my Moros does northwards of 15k DPS....
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.11 02:27:20
|
66. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rroff wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: Except all you had to do was... warp... away.... If you're trying to outrun a long point, there's a nifty little maneuver called the "slingshot trick". Again, when the fighters are..... "amped up", as you sai...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.11 01:03:43
|
67. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rroff wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: 4) We know nothing about the fit on the Claw or his skills except that he has a MWD and goes not even 4km/s, and all he's doing is attempting to keep at range 1,000km. He doesn't try to warp off, he doesn't o...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.11 00:17:07
|
68. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rroff wrote: Nasar Vyron wrote: Doesn't really change the fact that fighters are meant to be anti-sub cap tho and increasing it too much defeats their purpose unless they are to only be anti-BC/BS in the times ahead. Tho that would take one...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.11 00:07:32
|
69. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Primary This Rifter wrote: Mike Azariah wrote: It is hard to imagine this being playtested on Sisi because so much of it WILL be psyops. So we can theroycraft and posture all you want . . . it will be tested when the rubber hits the road. ...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.11 00:00:53
|
70. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nasar Vyron wrote: They already have an attached sig of 125m, making too much larger would make it so they can't hit a cruiser. The entire purpose of fighters are to be anti-sub cap, while bombers are the anti-cap. There is nothing wrong with t...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.10 21:27:06
|
71. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: Let's hear your argument regarding this change. Scroll up. I did, and all I really found was ad hominem after strawman after cherry-picking after insult.
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.10 18:16:02
|
72. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Nolak Ataru wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Now instead of attempting to attack the man, try and attack his points Sure. Raise a few points and we'll attack em. Still waiting for any meaningful argument from you in the ISBoxer ...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.10 17:44:53
|
73. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: [quote=Querns]Now instead of attempting to attack the man, try and attack his points Sure. Raise a few points and we'll attack em. Still waiting for any meaningful argument from you in the ISBoxer thread btw.
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.10 17:18:46
|
74. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Holly Hardcore wrote: 2. Oh no, i want scoop my drones after each site, cause i will do only 60Mill ticks not 70Mill like i do atm... lol The only way you're getting 60-70m ticks is if you're running with a buddy, or if you have a webbing /...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.10 16:34:55
|
75. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Alp Khan wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Alp Khan wrote: You are wrong. Even so, I appreciate your candor. However, this isn't Zulu. Goons, fousands of them, don't shoot til you see the whites of their lies? Coming from a high-sec salvager, wh...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.10 00:32:43
|
76. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Having battles over sov consisting of nothing but trollcepters and their ineffective counters is not a healthy game or what CCP wants. Jesus christ I'm agreeing with baltec1.......
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.09 22:23:30
|
77. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Yep 2 preformed fleets trying to chase multiple inty gangs around 3 regions sounds exactly like the problem that you're trying to frame as other people's issue. Unless of course you can ban these evil ceptors and just wait at a ...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.09 18:12:57
|
78. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
John McCreedy wrote: First off, thanks for posting this. It's good that you're prepared to listen rather than railroad through changes. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - *gasp* - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Good one mate.
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.09 17:56:02
|
79. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lamar Muvila wrote: Wouldn't it work to have carriers anchor when they have fighters assigned and combine that with a minimum distance from a pos or station and if that isn't enough limit assigning fighters to cruisers and larger ships. The anc...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.07 21:01:26
|
80. Sticky:[Scylla] Skynet - Removing fighter assist for carriers - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rroff wrote: ^^ C5 and upwards caps on field due to the escalation (C4s don't escalate) - C4 people "tend" (its not common but not completely uncommon either*) to sit the carrier outside the FF and assign fighters to a marauder (or tengu) in si...
- by Nolak Ataru - at 2015.03.07 19:40:25
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |